About this site's lack of design: Yes, it's supposed to look this way — I'm helping create a new sandbox theme for WordPress (see it on GitHub).

Dan Rubin's SuperfluousBanter

Suffering from chronic idiocy since 1977

Archive for April, 2003

Older | Newer

Zeldman-esque Redesign

Friday, April 18th, 2003

After much delay, I’m finally ready to start forc­ing my redesign of this site on you, the reader.

As Zeld­man is doing with his site, as of today (in case you didn’t notice) I am redesign­ing in pub­lic. It shouldn’t last too long, since I’ve made sure most of the CSS already works, but please be aware that you may need to reload the page if some­thing looks screwy. If reload­ing doesn’t help, just post a com­ment let­ting me know, and I’ll get to fix­ing it.

Post your comments/thoughts on the new look — I want to know what you think!

[Update] You will note that the sub­pages of the site still sport the old design. This is inten­tional, as I’d rather smooth out the rough edges on the index page only before con­vert­ing all the archives, sub­pages, etc.

Also, let me know if you see any dif­fer­ence in page load times — I have a feel­ing that all the extra alter­nate stylesheets will increase that time for some peo­ple. Let me know either way, thanks!

Categories:

No Comments

CSS Layout Generator

Thursday, April 17th, 2003

Two new lay­out tools have been released to the mar­ket, except these tools are free, and web-based: A 3 col­umn CSS lay­out gen­er­a­tor (float-based) and a 3 col­umn CSS lay­out gen­er­a­tor (absolute posi­tion­ing).

These tools allow you to adjust major set­tings in the lay­out, and pro­vide you with the fin­ished code to copy and paste when the lay­out is to your liking.

Both gen­er­a­tors pro­duce Netscape 4-compatible CSS (for those of you still unable to wres­tle free of its wretched grasp), and both incor­po­rate a header and a footer into the layout.

(via Zeld­man)

Categories:

No Comments

A New Post

Monday, April 14th, 2003

I’m pleased to announce the addi­tion of a new author to web-graphics.com: Me.

I made my first post this after­noon (regard­ing the new ver­sion of Safari), and I hope to become a wor­thy con­trib­u­tor to the site. Just to have my name on the short list of authors (some of the bright­est minds on the web today, in my opin­ion) is an honor, so I will do my darn­d­est to make it worthwhile.

If you’ve never vis­ited, check it out today. I’ve also added the site to the list of links on the right.

Categories:

No Comments

Safari Default Text Size

Sunday, April 13th, 2003

Dave Hyatt posted a query regard­ing the default text size in Safari, Apple’s new web browser (cur­rently in beta). I posted my sug­ges­tions in the com­ments for his post, but I thought I would mir­ror them here for your read­ing pleasure:

It seems a lot of the com­ments posted thus far are per­sonal pref­er­ence, which is not (in my opin­ion) the issue at hand here. If a user wants to change the default font size set­ting, it should be easy to do so (in that regard, plac­ing the -/+ but­tons in the tool bar by default would be a ter­rific idea), how­ever, a user’s per­sonal pref­er­ence should not nec­es­sar­ily be taken into account for the default setting.

From a developer’s point of view, I agree that adopt­ing the “stan­dard” used by other major browsers on the Mac OS and other plat­forms is a good idea. It makes life much eas­ier for web devel­op­ers, since we can rest assured that we will not have to cre­ate a sep­a­rate set of CSS font rules just to acco­mo­date Safari users. Also, since many Mac-based web devel­op­ers are likely to use Safari as their pri­mary browser, hav­ing the out­put mimic that of the other tar­get browsers we develop for is a very use­ful feature.

From a user’s point of view, I have to view many sites every day which are devel­oped on other plat­forms, and a high per­cent­age of those sites are built with a cer­tain tar­get font size in mind. Hence the num­ber of com­ments regard­ing very small text on cer­tain sites built with PC users in mind (read: WinIE). I applaud your team’s cur­rent efforts to mimic many of the func­tion­ing behav­iors of WinIE, since it would be naive of any­one to ignor the strong hold WinIE has on the world­wide browser mar­ket. Many PC devel­op­ers will never specif­i­cally tar­get Safari, or any other Mac browser, and oth­ers are not likely to go out of their way to test a site on Safari to make sure it is usable, leg­i­ble, read­able, etc., so a strong case can be built in favor of mak­ing the Mac/Safari brows­ing expe­ri­ence as good as pos­si­ble by reduc­ing the num­ber of ren­der­ing dif­fer­ences between WinIE and Safari.

Safari is already my browser of choice (except for a few of my firm’s sites that still have ren­der­ing prob­lems only on Safari — see http://evergladesgateway.com/ for a recent exam­ple) but there is always room for improve­ment, and improv­ing the over­all user and devel­oper expe­ri­ence is the way to make Safari not just the best Mac browser, but the best browser on any platform.

Categories:

No Comments

BlogShares

Sunday, April 13th, 2003

I’m exper­i­ment­ing with a neat new toy (read: way to spend the lit­tle free time I have) — BlogShares. Basi­cally (and I’m still learn­ing about it), BlogShares places a vir­tual worth on your blog based on the num­ber of incom­ing links to your site, and allows oth­ers to “buy” shares of your site, and you to do like­wise. I found this ser­vice through DiveIn­toMark, and of course I can’t pass up the oppor­tu­nity to get SB listed in his new spon­sor sec­tion, so I signed up :-)

I’ll post more when I’ve played with it for a while…

Categories:

No Comments

Older | Newer