<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email Doesn&#8217;t Scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/</link>
	<description>Suffering from chronic idiocy since 1977</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niyaz</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27532</link>
		<dc:creator>Niyaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27532</guid>
		<description>I think thinking of it based on sheer numbers is the problem.
Some points:
(1) Sort your email based on the sender
(2) Senders you personally know are high priority
(3) Respond to others based on the sentenc.es rule.
(4) All this is a consequence of popularity and power. Adjust with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think thinking of it based on sheer numbers is the problem.<br />
Some points:<br />
(1) Sort your email based on the sender<br />
(2) Senders you personally know are high priority<br />
(3) Respond to others based on the sentenc.es rule.<br />
(4) All this is a consequence of popularity and power. Adjust with&nbsp;that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Shirey</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27438</link>
		<dc:creator>David Shirey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27438</guid>
		<description>The problem is that email should not be thought of as a universal communication solution.  That is, it doesn&#039;t work well in all situations.  Email is good if you need a yes or no type answer, and there will be no discussion.  If you have something complicated and you need discussion, all of a sudden you have 20 emails, each one sentence long, that consumes an hour of your time.  Sometimes you need the give and take of a personal conversation.  The problem with that?  No body answers their stinkin&#039; phone anymore.  And that is what has forced everyone to rely on email.  At least with email you have an date/time stamped audit trail to prove you tried to resolve the issue.  The real solution?  Stop doing or being involved with complicated things.  Just keep repeating &#039;Simple is better&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that email should not be thought of as a universal communication solution.  That is, it doesn&#8217;t work well in all situations.  Email is good if you need a yes or no type answer, and there will be no discussion.  If you have something complicated and you need discussion, all of a sudden you have 20 emails, each one sentence long, that consumes an hour of your time.  Sometimes you need the give and take of a personal conversation.  The problem with that?  No body answers their stinkin&#8217; phone anymore.  And that is what has forced everyone to rely on email.  At least with email you have an date/time stamped audit trail to prove you tried to resolve the issue.  The real solution?  Stop doing or being involved with complicated things.  Just keep repeating &#8216;Simple is&nbsp;better&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rubin</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27285</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Mike D:&lt;/strong&gt; Thx, I&#039;m happier with this theme than any I&#039;ve designed before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Mike D:</strong> Thx, I&#8217;m happier with this theme than any I&#8217;ve designed&nbsp;before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarven Capadisli</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27257</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarven Capadisli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27257</guid>
		<description>When all these attachments and replies are flying around it just creates chaos out of nothing.

Wiki+IRC is one way of going at it which I think covers 80% of the communication needs.

I&#039;ve written about IRC as a social platform here: http://www.csarven.ca/irc-social-network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When all these attachments and replies are flying around it just creates chaos out of&nbsp;nothing.</p>
<p>Wiki+<span class="caps">IRC</span> is one way of going at it which I think covers 80% of the communication&nbsp;needs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written about <span class="caps">IRC</span> as a social platform here:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.csarven.ca/irc-social-network" rel="nofollow">http://www.csarven.ca/irc-social-network</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Robin</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27246</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27246</guid>
		<description>Mike: Dan&#039;s blog design is like so super-wicked-cool. Especially the use of orange.

;)

Dan: I must admit, I don&#039;t exactly get swamped with e-mails...so it is hard for me to consider e-mails being a particularly bad way to communicate. E-mail Servers...yes, those are bastards(!) but e-mails aren&#039;t too bad. The bloated content only appears to stem from some people not knowing how to write well in e-mails, or, like me - just end up rambling on for too long.   

I use Gmail/Googlemail for my main web-related e-mails, and I must admit that having the Gmail Search facility (for example, if I wanted to find all e-mails in my Inbox that had the words &#039;superfluous banter&#039;) it is no problem at all, even with bloated text in the e-mails themselves. My spam filters are working ok too, and I use a different e-mail address for signing up to any sites where I suspect I might get any spam sent to me (which keeps it out of my Gmail account most of the time). I think e-mail is fine if it is used appropriately.

I think that&#039;s all I need to say on that for now - I ran in to some bitter controversy months ago with my less than favourable comments about the &#039;E-mail Standards Project&#039;, so I&#039;ve been wary to express an opinion about e-mail related matters since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Dan&#8217;s blog design is like so super-wicked-cool. Especially the use of&nbsp;orange.</p>
<p>;)</p>
<p>Dan: I must admit, I don&#8217;t exactly get swamped with e-mails&#8230;so it is hard for me to consider e-mails being a particularly bad way to communicate. E-mail Servers&#8230;yes, those are bastards(!) but e-mails aren&#8217;t too bad. The bloated content only appears to stem from some people not knowing how to write well in e-mails, or, like me - just end up rambling on for too&nbsp;long.   </p>
<p>I use Gmail/Googlemail for my main web-related e-mails, and I must admit that having the Gmail Search facility (for example, if I wanted to find all e-mails in my Inbox that had the words &#8216;superfluous banter&#8217;) it is no problem at all, even with bloated text in the e-mails themselves. My spam filters are working ok too, and I use a different e-mail address for signing up to any sites where I suspect I might get any spam sent to me (which keeps it out of my Gmail account most of the time). I think e-mail is fine if it is used&nbsp;appropriately.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s all I need to say on that for now - I ran in to some bitter controversy months ago with my less than favourable comments about the &#8216;E-mail Standards Project&#8217;, so I&#8217;ve been wary to express an opinion about e-mail related matters since&nbsp;then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/comment-page-1/#comment-27232</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2008/02/email-doesnt-scale/#comment-27232</guid>
		<description>I love your blog.  Did you design this yourself?  It rawks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your blog.  Did you design this yourself?  It&nbsp;rawks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.210 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-05 07:05:34 -->
