About this site's lack of design: Yes, it's supposed to look this way — I'm helping create a new sandbox theme for WordPress (see it on GitHub).

Dan Rubin's SuperfluousBanter

Suffering from chronic idiocy since 1977

Archive for April, 2004


Weekend Reading (18)

Friday, April 30th, 2004


No Comments

Guru on Paper: Edward Tufte

Thursday, April 29th, 2004

As requested by Jon Hicks,
I present to you none other than one of my favourite gurus: Edward Tufte. From
his book Envi­sion­ing Infor­ma­tion
to his lat­est essay on
, the man has changed my views on (infor­ma­tion) design and has
been an inspi­ra­tion ever since I made my first chart.

edward tufte

Through the magic of bits and bytes I have tele­ported a younger Edward Tufte
to the twenty-first cen­tury! As you can see he is giv­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion on good
design. Some­how that par­tic­u­lar slide looks famil­iar… Can it be that Tufte
has been noti­fied of the lat­est
rev­o­lu­tion in blo­gos­phere
? Has he come to real­ize that the new gen­er­a­tion
is ready to take on the liv­ing legends?

So what guru shall I draw next? Men­tion your favourite in the comments.



FAST: Koenigsegg CCR

Tuesday, April 27th, 2004

FAST Issue no.3


So, you would think Swe­den is only known for pro­duc­ing extremely safe but dull
cars, such as Saab and Volvo. Now, think again. Chris­t­ian von Koenigsegg grew
up with the dream of cre­at­ing the per­fect sports­car. After sev­eral years of
plan­ning he launched the Koenigsegg project in 1993. Designer David Craaford
pro­vided a design con­cept fol­low­ing Christian’s guide­lines. The vikings
now have a car that is going to make some noise in the super­car scene: the Koenigsegg




Weekend Reading (17)

Saturday, April 24th, 2004


No Comments

Bullish by Design

Friday, April 23rd, 2004

As both an econ­o­mist and designer I wel­comed a report by Design
enti­tled “The
Impact of Design on Stock Mar­ket Per­for­mance

Design is a crit­i­cal com­po­nent of busi­ness per­for­mance. We’ve
heard design­ers, com­men­ta­tors and com­pa­nies say it. But, to date, the evi­dence
for the link between share­holder return and invest­ment in design has been
scarce and anecdotal.”

While I strongly rec­om­mend this report to design­ers and man­agers alike I’m
afraid it is going to make more than one econ­o­mist frown. Design is a crit­i­cal
com­po­nent of busi­ness per­for­mance, no doubt. That said, I have trou­bles link­ing
design directly to stock mar­ket prices, even after read­ing this report. Com­pa­nies
are val­ued using finan­cial met­rics — fac­tual and ver­i­fi­able (behold the accoun­tants
and con­trollers do their work cor­rectly and honestly.)

More impor­tant than try­ing to link design to share
prices, is the rela­tion between design and busi­ness in gen­eral (not specif­i­cally
stock mar­ket per­for­mance). In my opin­ion bet­ter design leads to bet­ter prod­ucts,
and even­tu­ally improved busi­ness per­for­mance. My crit­i­cism is directed at their
method­ol­ogy and the vari­ables used to explain the rela­tion. To use stock mar­ket
per­for­mance as the basis for busi­ness per­for­mance is dubi­ous. More­over, nowa­days
share prices are pre­dom­i­nantly deter­mined by demand and sup­ply. It is
naïve to assume that share prices actu­ally reflect how a com­pany
is really performing.

I would have pre­ferred to see research based on the link between design and
inter­nal busi­ness per­for­mance, such as sales, cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion and brand
expe­ri­ence (i.e. bet­ter design leads to % increase in sales.) In my opin­ion
share prices are too volatile and include too much noise to con­clude to any­thing.
That said, the choice to use stock mar­ket per­for­mance as a met­ric is obvi­ous and prac­ti­cal,
being freely and pub­licly acces­si­ble information.

Despite the some­what flawed method­ol­ogy, this report is an excel­lent read and,
in all hon­esty, I could not agree more with their find­ings. Design mat­ters!
The gen­eral ideas elab­o­rated through­out this report make sense and have been
researched exten­sively. Design is indeed a crit­i­cal com­po­nent of busi­ness per­for­mance
— I’m just not so sure about stock mar­ket per­for­mance as a good
and reli­able metric.


1 Comment