<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ridiculously Cool Comment Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/</link>
	<description>Suffering from chronic idiocy since 1977</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 04:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Shaun Inman site is bitc..but anyway the preview thing is good but I like the link idea, so that people won&#039;t have to figure out the html/bbcode as much.  I&#039;ll have to try to get that implemeted at some point.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun Inman site is bitc..but anyway the preview thing is good but I like the link idea, so that people won’t have to figure out the html/bbcode as much.  I’ll have to try to get that implemeted at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Grucza</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Grucza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for this article - it&#039;s a great idea, and I probably wouldn&#039;t have come across it if you hadn&#039;t posted about it.  I think I&#039;m going to take the same general idea and modify it a bit for my own site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for this article — it’s a great idea, and I probably wouldn’t have come across it if you hadn’t posted about it.  I think I’m going to take the same general idea and modify it a bit for my own site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Heilemann</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Heilemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>Hey, and thanks for the kind words :)



I&#039;d just like to chime in with the facts before anyone gets the wrong idea: The resizing of the textarea on my blog was 100% inspired by Dunstan&#039;s blog. I&#039;m using it with his permission :)



And yeah, it _is_ a really cool feature, I use it a lot (when I&#039;m not in Safari :)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, and thanks for the kind words :)</p>
<p>I’d just like to chime in with the facts before anyone gets the wrong idea: The resizing of the textarea on my blog was 100% inspired by Dunstan’s blog. I’m using it with his permission :)</p>
<p>And yeah, it _is_ a really cool feature, I use it a lot (when I’m not in Safari :)).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David House</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>David House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Dunstan (www.1976design.com/blog) has that Increase &#124; Decrease textfield size widget as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunstan (www.1976design.com/blog) has that Increase | Decrease textfield size widget as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jul-</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>-jul-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>I did a small test on my Mac.

Safari 1.2.1: preview OK, resizing doesn&#039;t work, form styling doesn&#039;t work

Opera 7.50 pre3: preview OK, resizing OK, form styling doesn&#039;t work

Firefox 0.8: preview OK, resizing OK, form styling OK



Besides, I tried to cook a browser-based markup handler in JavaScript.  It&#039;s like BB tags, but there are a lot of extensions (for example [img &quot;left dotted&quot; /pic/illus.jpg This is a great illustration] generates &lt;div class=&quot;img left dotted&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/pic/illus.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;This is a great illustration&quot; /&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a great illustration&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;). JavaScript does this very-very ugly.  An hour earlier I would say &quot;client generated preview is good&quot;.  This is not true anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a small test on my Mac.</p>
<p>Safari 1.2.1: preview OK, resizing doesn’t work, form styling doesn’t work</p>
<p>Opera 7.50 pre3: preview OK, resizing OK, form styling doesn’t work</p>
<p>Firefox 0.8: preview OK, resizing OK, form styling OK</p>
<p>Besides, I tried to cook a browser-based markup handler in JavaScript.  It’s like BB tags, but there are a lot of extensions (for example [img “left dotted” /pic/illus.jpg This is a great illustration] generates &lt;div class=“img left dotted”&gt;&lt;img src=”/pic/illus.jpg” alt=“This is a great illustration” /&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a great illustration&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;). JavaScript does this very-very ugly.  An hour earlier I would say “client generated preview is good”.  This is not true anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkBlue</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>1) I think the controls to increase/decrease the height of the textarea are invaluable and a worthwhile innovation. It&#039;s certainly beneficial to the user.



2) As John Hicks comments above, Omniweb&#039;s textarea editor window seems to be another fantastic and user-friendly feature (although I haven&#039;t seen it myself).



3) But the dynamic preview is not something I enjoy. I find it hugely distracting when writing comments (the animation effect is quite annoying). Also I find my eyes drawn to my scroll bar which is is constantly rescaling everytime word-wrap kicks in, or I hit [enter].



I would also question the usefulness of this, especially if one has a resizable textarea. Surely you can preview as you type in the textarea itself - why do I need to look elsewhere for a preview?



Furthermore, I prefer the server generated preview. This forces you to stop and check and can offer other benefits such as highlighting misspellings, rendering tags, censoring, etc.



Having said all that, I would add that I too love the level of innovation seen in weblogs, it&#039;s great to see the barriers pushed ever higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I think the controls to increase/decrease the height of the textarea are invaluable and a worthwhile innovation. It’s certainly beneficial to the user.</p>
<p>2) As John Hicks comments above, Omniweb’s textarea editor window seems to be another fantastic and user-friendly feature (although I haven’t seen it myself).</p>
<p>3) But the dynamic preview is not something I enjoy. I find it hugely distracting when writing comments (the animation effect is quite annoying). Also I find my eyes drawn to my scroll bar which is is constantly rescaling everytime word-wrap kicks in, or I hit [enter].</p>
<p>I would also question the usefulness of this, especially if one has a resizable textarea. Surely you can preview as you type in the textarea itself — why do I need to look elsewhere for a preview?</p>
<p>Furthermore, I prefer the server generated preview. This forces you to stop and check and can offer other benefits such as highlighting misspellings, rendering tags, censoring, etc.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I would add that I too love the level of innovation seen in weblogs, it’s great to see the barriers pushed ever higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didier Hilhorst</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Didier Hilhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>@Jon



Ugh, you painfully remind me I&#039;m on Windows. I seriously need to get a Mac soon. It&#039;s not that I think Windows is so terrible, it&#039;s more the fact that Apple is just a zillion times more sexy and lickable. I need more lickable stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon</p>
<p>Ugh, you painfully remind me I’m on Windows. I seriously need to get a Mac soon. It’s not that I think Windows is so terrible, it’s more the fact that Apple is just a zillion times more sexy and lickable. I need more lickable stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bramwell</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bramwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>Widgets like these make my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Widgets like these make my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hicks</title>
		<link>http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-co/comment-page-1/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superfluousbanter.org/beta/archives/2004/03/ridiculously-cool-comment-tools/#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Omniweb (Mac OS X browser) has a fantastic feature to help with small textareas. It adds a small button to the top of the scrollbar area, which once clicked, opens up an editor window that you can resize and import text into. I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniweb (Mac OS X browser) has a fantastic feature to help with small textareas. It adds a small button to the top of the scrollbar area, which once clicked, opens up an editor window that you can resize and import text into. I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/20 queries in 0.523 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: superfluousbanter.org @ 2012-05-21 06:00:39 -->
