About this site's lack of design: Yes, it's supposed to look this way — I'm helping create a new sandbox theme for WordPress (see it on GitHub).

Dan Rubin's SuperfluousBanter

Suffering from chronic idiocy since 1977

Archive for July, 2003

Newer

Homeland Insecurity

Thursday, July 17th, 2003

In a move which brings a whole new mean­ing to the “Blue Screen of Death”, the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity has awarded a $90 Mil­lion con­tract to Microsoft to pro­vide the desk­top and server soft­ware for about 140,000 com­put­ers inside the organization.

I would nor­mally use pro­fan­ity here, but I think I’m too stunned by the com­plete igno­rance this deci­sion displays.

Tom Ridge and Co. cer­tainly had other options, and I think we all know that bad things are likely to hap­pen because of this.

Oth­ers have men­tioned mov­ing to another coun­try as a safety mea­sure — I vote for North­ern Ire­land, at least it’s safe there…

Categories:

2 Comments

Recent Adventures in Moblogging

Wednesday, July 16th, 2003

I’m lucky enough to be a second-round beta tester for SixApart’s upcom­ing Type­Pad ser­vice, and I’ve just been hav­ing a blast post­ing via email (“Moblogging”).

My test site is Super­flu­ous Life, and is light on con­tent, and even lighter on design (for more on why I’m not mess­ing with the code/layout/design, read this post).

Check it out, give me some traf­fic so I can test out the stats fea­ture, and as an added bonus, you get to see my photo in the sidebar :-)

Although I’m not allowed to dis­cuss details about Type­Pad and my expe­ri­ences with it dur­ing the beta, I will say this: you or some­one you know will want to use Type­Pad. I’m strongly con­sid­er­ing keep­ing one active site run­ning on Type­Pad once the ser­vice goes live.

Categories:

No Comments

RIP Netscape

Wednesday, July 16th, 2003

AOL has finally axed Netscape. Luck­ily, Mozilla devel­op­ment will con­tinue, at least for the time being.

Unfor­tu­nately, this only weak­ens the browser mar­ket by leav­ing IE/Windows and Safari as the only fully-supported browsers under devel­op­ment (if you can still refer to IE as “under devel­op­ment”). Yes, there are still other browsers around (Opera fans UNITE!), and yes, AOL will be giv­ing the Mozilla Foun­da­tion $2 Mil­lion to start them off (“here you go kid­dies, a lit­tle play money for the rest of your sum­mer vaca­tion”), but for Netscape to cease to exist is a rather impor­tant mile­stone in the evo­lu­tion of the web, and con­sid­er­ing the level of stan­dards com­pli­ance Netscape has pro­vided in a main­stream browser, it’s death is not what I’d call a good sign.

Will Mozilla (and all its off­shoots — I love using Fire­bird on my PC, and Camino still gets use when­ever I tire of Safari’s quirks) be able to stick it out and find/create a source of fund­ing for con­tin­ued devel­op­ment? I hope so — I would hate to see the browser mar­ket shrink to Safari and IE.

Categories:

2 Comments

Of Work

Wednesday, July 9th, 2003

The story is the same every­where you look: Design­ers are strug­gling to make ends meet, espe­cially free­lancers, inde­pen­dent con­sul­tants, and small firms like mine (we have two employ­ees: my younger and oh-so-talented brother, Alex, and me).

We’ve been try­ing des­per­ately to make a liv­ing for quite some time now, with­out much suc­cess — per­haps we charge too lit­tle, maybe we’re just not sales­men, or it could even be that we don’t like work­ing with clients who don’t appre­ci­ate good work when we give it to them, no mat­ter what they pay us — we spend so much time on projects (again, prob­a­bly not mak­ing enough money on them…) that we don’t leave our­selves with enough time to pro­duce any self pro­mo­tional mate­ri­als (one day, I will write a book about being a web devel­op­ment firm with­out a web site: see the Web­graph, Inc. Cor­po­rate Web­site for more informa…oh wait, there’s noth­ing there). We would really like to be able to put some money in our pock­ets, fix our car (that’s cor­rect, “car” as in “sin­gu­lar”) or maybe even get one each. Heck, we’d love to col­lab­o­rate remotely on projects with other designers/programmers (we have a few projects we’re try­ing to get fund­ing for just so we can work with the likes of waferbaby, Icon­Fac­tory, and per­haps even Zeld­man him­self, bud­get per­mit­ting) for the expe­ri­ence, the extra name recog­ni­tion, and the money, of course.

A prob­lem I’ve run into over and over is that of hav­ing stan­dards which seem to be too high, yet I can’t bring myself to com­pro­mise those stan­dards just to make a buck. A few years ago, I free­lanced for a local com­pany for a few weeks, and was even offered a job (their clients liked my work bet­ter than any of their full-time employ­ees’ :-) but I couldn’t take it because they insisted on allow­ing sub-standard work to pass for “com­pleted” and I just wasn’t up to the task of putting half-assed work out in pub­lic (I turned down a very decent salary too). I still see a lot of their work on a reg­u­lar basis, and it’s so bad I want to tell them where they can put it… But they’re mak­ing mil­lions a year, and we can’t scrape together enough to fix the wind­shield wiper motor on the car, so who am I to judge?

To get to the point (finally), if any­one out there needs work, or help on a project, at any level, please drop us a line — we’re very reli­able (how can you beat two Eagle Scouts?) and we’re always will­ing to learn new skills and work with new peo­ple. But hey, if you’d rather keep the work for your­self, we understand :-)

Categories:

10 Comments

CSS Can Be Beautiful

Monday, July 7th, 2003

At least, that’s what Zeld­man says today about my CSS Zen Gar­den sub­mis­sion, Not So Min­i­mal. It’s nice to know smart peo­ple think highly of my work…

Categories:

6 Comments

Newer