About this site's lack of design: Yes, it's supposed to look this way — I'm using a sandbox theme for WordPress (see it on GitHub).

Dan Rubin's SuperfluousBanter

Design, random musings, and the Web. Since 1977


Not So Minimal

It’s offi­cial: My first (well, sec­ond real­ly; see below) entry to Dave Shea’s CSS Zen Gar­den has been accept­ed: Not So Minimal

My orig­i­nal sub­mis­sion was deemed too min­i­mal for Dav­e’s anti-min­i­mal pol­i­cy — I don’t dis­agree with this judge­ment, though I still believe min­i­mal design is as valid a style as any oth­er. “Not So Min­i­mal” is the result of a few extra hours spent with my orig­i­nal design, adding some col­or and the obvi­ous abstract image com­pos­ite for the header.

I’m work­ing now on a few more designs, this time with dif­fer­ent goals (more flu­id designs, less grid-like lay­outs, etc.) — they should be ready in a few weeks (work per­mit­ting), and we’ll see how they fare once submitted.

This item was posted by Dan Rubin on Tuesday, June 24th, 2003.


You can follow comments on this item via the RSS 2.0 feed.

Comments are closed.

8 comments on “Not So Minimal”

  1. Posted by Kris on Tuesday, June 24th, 2003.

    Please for­give me if I’m wrong… but isn’t it the same design with alter­nate colours? I think I bet­ter go to bed and have a clos­er look lat­er tonight.

  2. Posted by Dan on Tuesday, June 24th, 2003.

    HI Kris, yes, it’s the same design, altered to bet­ter suit Dav­e’s anti-min­i­mal design rules for the CSS Zen Gar­den. Dave real­ly liked the orig­i­nal, all-gray design, but since accept­ing it would have gone against the anti-min­i­mal pol­i­cy he had put in place him­self, he could­n’t accept it as-is. I did­n’t want to go back to the draw­ing board com­plete­ly, so I added in some abstract pho­tog­ra­phy and altered the col­ors (well, added col­ors) to spice it up a bit, and make it a lit­tle less-minimalist.

  3. Posted by VTS on Tuesday, June 24th, 2003.

    Great CSS design. Sim­ple and func­tion­al. By the way, what font did you use for your sec­tion headings?

  4. Posted by Dan on Wednesday, June 25th, 2003.

    The type­face used is FF DIN Con­densed from FontShop (the sec­tion head­ings are DIN Con­densed BoldAlternate).

    The entire FF DIN fam­i­ly is great, very ver­sa­tile, though I’ve always pre­ferred the con­densed series; the upper­case and low­er­case char­ac­ters seem to “fit” much bet­ter (“fit” is obvi­ous­ly an extreme­ly tech­ni­cal typo­graph­i­cal term ;-)

  5. Posted by VTS on Wednesday, June 25th, 2003.

    Thanks for the info Dan. I’ve been stuck on a cre­ative funk doing our com­pa­ny site redesign. A cou­ple hours of vol­ley­ball this evening and a new font to play with will sure help. :-)

  6. Posted by Didier Hilhorst on Wednesday, June 25th, 2003.

    Looks great. Period.

  7. Posted by Sunny on Thursday, June 26th, 2003.

    FF Din is a very nice font. But it is a hefty price ($180)! I guess when you are a web design pro, its more of an investment.

  8. Posted by Dan on Thursday, June 26th, 2003.

    If you work with type enough, you start to real­ly appre­ci­ate the extra work which goes into the faces pro­duced by the larg­er foundries, and the cost becomes low­er when com­pared to the extra time you have to spend when deal­ing with low­er-qual­i­ty fonts.

    We use a hand­ful of faces pro­duced by FontShop, and we’ve been thrilled with all of them — if you have the mon­ey to spend, you won’t be sorry.

    The oth­er thing to keep in mind is the ver­sa­til­i­ty of a giv­en type­face for the style of work you do. For instance, the FFDIN, FFIn­fo and FFIn­ter­state fam­i­lies work very well with the style of work I pro­duce, so it’s worth it to me to have them avail­able. I use type­faces sim­i­lar to the way a pho­tog­ra­ph­er uses dif­fer­ent lens­es, or a painter uses dif­fer­ent brush­es: you get used to the ones which work well for your style, and you keep using them over and over again because you know exact­ly what you will get out of them.

    Then again, if you’re not the kind of per­son who obsess­es over type in your day-to-day life, spend­ing a few hun­dred dol­lars on one fam­i­ly isn’t real­ly necessary :-)